Explaining global inequalities Cambridge IGCSE Sociology revision

Not started

Learn it

In plain words

The world's richest countries and its poorest are separated by a gap in income of something like a hundred to one. Sociologists do not put that down to luck or laziness. They trace it to history, to the way the world economy works, and to who holds power.

8 things to know

  1. Global inequality is the unequal distribution of wealth, income and life chances between the countries of the world.
  2. Colonialism is the control of one territory by a more powerful country, which rules it and takes its resources. For centuries European powers ruled large parts of Africa, Asia and the Americas.
  3. Colonial rulers took raw materials, land and labour, and shaped the colonies' economies to serve themselves. At independence, many former colonies were left poor and dependent on selling a few raw materials.
  4. Marxist views of capitalist exploitation: the rich countries and their companies exploit the poor ones. They buy raw materials and labour cheaply and sell finished goods at high prices. Debt and unfair trade rules keep poor countries poor.
  5. For Marxists the world is divided in the way a society is divided into classes, with the rich countries in the place of the ruling class.
  6. Feminist ideas of patriarchy: within poor countries, women are the poorest. Where men hold power, women and girls have less access to education, land, paid work and political office, and do most of the unpaid work.
  7. Feminists argue that development which ignores women will fail, and that educating girls is among the most effective ways to reduce poverty.
  8. Evaluation. Some former colonies have become rich, which suggests that government, education and stability also matter. Trade and investment have lifted many people out of poverty. No single explanation is enough.

Worked example

A country exports raw cocoa cheaply and imports expensive chocolate. Explain how a Marxist would see this.

  1. The country sells a raw material at a low price set by buyers in rich countries.
  2. The valuable stage, turning cocoa into chocolate, is done by companies elsewhere, which keep the profit.
  3. The country then pays high prices for the finished product.
  4. For a Marxist this is capitalist exploitation: wealth flows from the poor country to the rich one.

Tips and tricks

  • Three explanations to learn, with one phrase for each: colonialism (history), Marxism (exploitation by capitalism), feminism (patriarchy).
  • For evaluation, use the countries that were colonies and are now rich. They show that the past does not fix the future.
5 questions, about 2 minutes.

It lands in your notebook with its questions as flashcards.

Explaining global inequalities: 5 questions and answers

These are the quiz’s questions. Do the quiz first, then come back here for the ones that got you.

  1. What is colonialism?
    • trade between equal countries
    • the control and use of one territory by a more powerful country (the answer)
    • the movement of workers abroad
    • a type of charity

    The colony's resources served the ruling power.

  2. How do Marxists explain global inequality?
    • poor countries have too few people
    • poor countries have bad weather
    • rich capitalist countries and companies exploit poorer countries (the answer)
    • women hold too much power

    Wealth flows from poor countries to rich ones.

  3. What do feminists focus on in explaining global inequality?
    • climate
    • colonial history only
    • company profits only
    • patriarchy and the position of women (the answer)

    Women are the poorest of the poor.

  4. What were many colonies left dependent on at independence?
    • exporting a few raw materials (the answer)
    • exporting high-technology goods
    • tourism from their neighbours
    • their own large industries

    Their economies had been shaped to supply the ruling country.

  5. Some former colonies are now among the richest countries in the world. What does this suggest?Stretch
    • colonialism had no effect at all
    • all former colonies are rich
    • colonialism alone cannot explain global inequality (the answer)
    • colonialism was good for every colony

    Other factors, such as government and education, also matter.

Still stuck on this one?Ask in the Papermunch Discord, or help someone else who is. Discord is for ages 13 and up.Join the server

Things you can type

Or go straight to

Or browse a shelf